Professor Taban lo Liyong |
So what? Any memories of the Kwani? series elicited by
this phrase? If Taban lo Liyong believes that the East African region is a
literary desert should we weep? Or should we whip/flog ourselves for such a
thing? Or rather, and on a different note, from which pedestal does Taban stand
as he makes this declaration? From which eon was this statement made and of
what relevance is it to a budding East African contemporary writer/scholar?
May be we should ask Prof Wanjala whose recent
sentiments sought to understand who commissioned Prof Taban as the prefect of
the region’s literariness. I am no expert in matters to do with the region’s
creative dexterity and neither am I good with words. In other words, I would
not even begin to consider myself a speck of a drop that would in a small way
seek to quench the thirst in the said desert. Only a verse or two would stand
wobbly in ‘solidarity’ with me when it comes to writing.
Although truth
be told. At the time that Taban unleashed his wrath about the region’s dryness
as far as creativity is concerned, there were sproutings here and there to
contradict his words. The only problem is that writing during the colonial and
immediately postcolonial times was largely in English. Even Ngugi wa Thiong’o laments
in Decolonising the Mind that any
other form of writing was not considered as African literature. Consequently,
writings in local languages and especially those in Kiswahili suffered the damnation
of this parameter of judging what could be regarded as literature of the region
or continent respectively. Thus, this in a way lends credence to Taban’s words
that our region was devoid of writing.
It is this that resulted to writers like Shaaban
Robert famed for Maisha Yangu na Baada ya Miaka Hamsini, Kusadikika,
and Wasifu wa Siti binti Saad
among others being overlooked. Other compatriots like Ibrahim Hussein a prominent
dramatist who wrote Kinjeketile (1969), Mashetani (1971), Jogoo
Kijijini (1976), and Arusi (1980)were equally served with a portent
dose of biased studies such that their works were almost reduced to set books
for schools only. This led to persistent marginalisation thereby and once more
underscoring the assumption that the region had no prowess when it came to dominions
of imagination.
Universities in the region have not tasked themselves
with the need to demystify the perception that ours is nothing but a literary
desert. As scholars, we have cast our nets and buckets were we are. Very few
scholars venture outside their comfort zones to study non-mainstream texts. I
mean, I still remember being asked to justify why I wanted to study John
Kiriamiti’s et al books for my postgrad! Someone actually dared me to explain
of what merit such an undertaking would have to academic circles. If only the
scholars dared to wade through unchartered waters! Now you understand why
sometimes it takes horrific occurrences like the Westgate Mall terrorist attack
to get scholars, politicians and the like wagging their tongues.
I don’t blame Taban. I cannot blame the Professor for
year in, year out appearing like a controversial scarecrow that permanently
clings to its position and scares the wit out of any marauding animal that
ventures into the garden of East African writing. His statement is like the
warning light that comes on in a car when it is running low on fuel. Whether you
are broke or not, the light is a constant reminder that you have to refuel. And
even when you refuel and keep driving, the light comes on again after sometime
to ‘ignorantly’ remind you that it is nigh time to revisit the fuel pumps. Thus,
Taban’s words are a constant aide memoire that we must keep the flame of
writing on irrespective of the times, the number of writers, publishers, or
books etc.
I wouldn’t want to rant about Taban as not knowing
what he is saying. Mine is an appreciation that we cannot have enough of books
to quench the thirst for reading. I actually pen this down as a tribute to all
the East African writers who have tangibly contested Taban’s words through
their writings. Theirs is a living testimony that ours is a region blooming
with vegetated cover of books that is regularly watered and nurtured by the
oasis of the genius minds of our writers.
The only protestations I harbour here are towards myself
for not being an avid reader. Therefore, I hereby sentence myself to a lifetime
of books, hard labour of reading and intermittent strokes of the cane by way of
book reviews and critical thoughts based on East African writings. This sentence
has no room for reprieve, presidential amnesty or anything whosoever that would
give me a chance to get outside the bars of maximum literary imprisonment.
I mean how on earth can I decry lack of books when we
have writers such as Ken Walibora, Kinyanjui Kombani, Ng’ang’a Mbugua, Jamal Mahjoub,
Tayeb Salih, Abdulrazak Gurnah, Moyez Vassanji, Timothy Wangusa, Nuruddin
Farah, Ahmed Artan Hanghe, Susan Kiguli, Esther Kamatari, Benjamin Sehene, Edouard
Gasarabwe, Nadifa Mohamed, Maxamed Daahir Afrax, Amandina Lihamba, Moses
Isegawa, Doreen Baingana, Bonnie Lubega, Shailja Patel, Yvonne Adhiambo Owuor, Binyavanga
Wainaina....
This is just but a taste of the writers we have in
addition to the more usual names of John Ruganda, Ngugi wa Thiong’o, Wahome
Mutahi, Grace Ogot, Francis Imbuga, Barbara Kimenye, Katama Mkangi, Meja
Mwangi, Marjorie Oludhe MacGoye, Sam Kahiga, David Mailu, John Kiriamiti… the
list is as long as it would take to dispute any notion that the East African
region is nothing but a literary desert.
The next time someone irks you about East Africa
being a literary desert, tell them that Taban’s statement has metamorphosed
into a cliché which we are glad to relish as a plat form that reminds us of our
humble beginnings as a region in the bigger spectrum of the literary world.